The implementation of monetary policy in the Euroarea, United Kingdom and USA : Evidence from financial crisis period

Part of : MIBES Transactions : international journal ; Vol.7, 2013, pages 110-120

Issue:
Pages:
110-120
Author:
Abstract:
This paper examines the monetary policy implementation before during and after the financial crisis for USA, UK and selected Eurozone countries. The empirical approach we follow is the Vector Error Correction model based on time series approach which examines analytically the monetary policy transmission mechanism. According to our results, the Euroarea monetary authorities are more inflation targeted comparing to USA and UK in the application of monetary policy strategy. Also, the analysis showed relatively high degree of European bond market integration before the crisis outbreak. We imply a structural break on our analysis for crisis period to examine the effect of the global market turbulence on monetary policy implementation. As we observed, the financial crisis distorted significantly the transmission channel and revealed different responses by central banks. However, the expansionary monetary strategy based on the implementation of unconventional measures prevented from an extended output contraction. Finally, we use some key macroeconomic variables to perform a comparison between the countries set and the Germany. Our results were significantly different from benchmark VEC framework indicating the existence of heterogeneity in the countries sample. So, the monetary authorities have to continue the use of unconventional measures to absorb the crisis repercussions, avoiding the fiscal expansion which deteriorated the market turmoil and results in increased debt level for the Eurozone countries.
Subject:
Subject (LC):
Keywords:
monetary policy, central banks, VEC, financial crisis
References (1):
  1. Abassi, P. Linzert, T. (2011), The effectiveness of monetary policy in steering money market rates ECB working paper seriesAdrian, T. & Shin, H. (2010), “Financial intermediaries and monetary economics,” Handbook of Monetary Economics, forthcomingBernanke, B. & Blinder, A. (1992), “The federal funds rate and the channels of monetary transmission,” American Economic Review, 82(4), 901-921Bernanke, B. & Mihov, I. (1998), “Measuring monetary policy,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 869-902Borio, C. and H. Zhu (2008), “Capital regulation, risk-taking and monetary policy: a missing link in the transmission mechanism?,” BIS Working Paper Series, 268Canova, F. & De Nicoló, G. (2002), “Monetary Disturbances Matter for Business Fluctuations in the G-7,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 49, 1131-1159Carpenter, S. Demiralp, S. (2011), Volatility, money market rates and the transmission of monetary policy, international journal of central bankingChristiano, L. Eichenbaum, M. & Evans, C. (1999), “Monetary policy shocks: What have we learned and to what end?,” in J. Taylor and M. Woodford (eds), Handbookof Macroeconomics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 65-148Chun A. 2010. Expectations, bond yields and monetary policy, review of financial studiesDen Haan, W. Sumner S. & Yamashiro, G. (2007), “Bank loan portfolios and the monetary transmisison mechanism,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, 904-924Giannone, D. Lenza M. & Reichlin, L. (2009), “Money, credit, monetary policy and the business cycle in the euro area,” mimeoHerro, N. Murrey, J. (2011), Dynamics of monetary policy uncertainty and the impact on macroeconomy, working paperLenza, M. Pill, H. & Reichlin, L. (2010), “Monetary policy in exceptional times,” Economic Policy, 62, 295-340Mishkin, F. (2011), Monetary policy strategy: Lessons from crisis, NBER working paperPeersman, G. (2011), “Consequences of different types of credit market disturbances on the Euro area economy,” manuscript, Ghent University