Enhancing the employability of high school graduates : impact of emotional intelligence

Part of : WSEAS transactions on business and economics ; Vol.10, No.2, 2013, pages 89-96

Issue:
Pages:
89-96
Author:
Abstract:
Employability is referred to as the relative potential of an individual to obtain and retain suitable employment in the labour market. Success in higher education is an effective way of enhancing the employability of youth. Competitiveness of examinations has added in to the challenges and aspirations of youth. The objective of the study was to examine the impact of high school students’ emotional intelligence (EI) for their Training (study) approaches and employability potential. Eighty five high school (Advanced Level) students (40 girls, and 45 boys) were randomly selected from two high schools in Sri Lanka. They were preparing in three different subject streams for the university entrance examination. Emotional intelligence of the respondents was measured through Genos EI Inventory. Respondents’ training (study) approaches were assessed through the ‘revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire’ of Biggs et.al. SPSS computer software was employed for descriptive and inferential analysis of data. The employability potential of the students was assessed based on their academic performances. Emotional intelligence, and the Training (study) approaches (motives, and strategies) used by the respondents were assessed. Relationships were sought with students’ employability potential (academic performances). High school girls revealed deeper training (study) approaches and their academic performances were superior to the boys. There was no significant impact of EI level to the training (study) process behavior of the respondents, and to their employability potential (academic performances). However, findings revealed a positive relationship between the Emotional Self Control and Employability potential (Academic performances) of high school students. This warrants further analysis, especially in a cultural context. It implies a competitive advantage (employability potential) for students with a better control of self emotions. This has the potential to generate a practical sense in academic and corporate environments alike. Further research is recommended on varying socio-cultural, and demographic segments.
Subject:
Subject (LC):
Keywords:
emotional intelligence, employability potential, high school students, study process
Notes:
Περιέχει διαγράμματα, πίνακες και βιβλιογραφία
References (1):
  1. [1] Mayer, J.D. and Salovey, P. ‘what is emotionalintelligence?’ In Salovey, P. Shuyter, D. (Eds.),Emotional development and emotionalintelligence: Educational Implications, pp. 331,New York, Basic Books, 1997[2] Chamorro-Premuzic, T. Arteche, A., Bremner,A J. Greven, C., & Furnham, A. ‘Soft Skills inHigher Education: Importance andImprovement Ratings as a Function ofIndividual Differences and AcademicPerformance’, Educational Psychology, 2010,Vol.30, No. 2, pp. 211-241.[3] Bowles, S. and Gintis, H.‘Comments on thelong shadow of work’, Critical Sociology,1999,Vol. 25, pp. 3-7.[4] Poropat, A. E. ‘The role of citizenshipperformance in academic achievement andgraduate employability’, Education + Training,2011, Vol. 53, No. 6, pp. 499-514[5] Whitmire, E. ‘The relationship betweenundergraduates’ background characteristics andcollege experiences and their academic libraryuse’, College & Research Libraries, 2001,Vol.62 No. 6, pp. 528-40.[6] Schmulian, A and Coetzee, S. ‘Classabsenteeism: reasons for non-attendance andthe effect on academic performance’,Accounting Research Journal, 2011, Vol. 24No. 2, pp. 178-194[7] Marburger, D. R ‘Absenteeism andundergraduate exam performance”, Journal ofEconomic Education, 2001, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp.99-109.[8] Hall, D. T. ‘Introduction: long live the career- arelational approach’, in Hall, D.T. (Ed.), TheCareer Is Dead – Long Live the Career, JosseyBass,San Francisco, CA, 1996, pp.1-14[9] DEST, ‘Employability skills for the future’,Commonwealth Department of Education,Science, and Training, Canberra, 2002[10] Leckey, J.F. and McGuigan, M.A., ‘Righttracks-wrong rails: the development genericskills in higher education’, Research in Highereducation, 1997, Vol.38, No. 03, pp. 365-78[11] Clarke, M., ‘Understanding and managingemployability in changing career contexts’,Journal of European Industrial Training, 2008,Vol. 32, No.4, pp. 258-284.[12] Suciu, M., Ghitiu-Bratescu, A., Piciorus, L.,and Imbrisca, C., ‘Reporting on intellectualcapital: value driver in the Romanianknowledge based Society’, InternationalJournal of Education and InformationTechnologies, 2011, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 215-224.[13] Jayawardena, L.N.A.C., and Gregar, A.,‘Emotional Intelligence and AcademicPerformances of High School Students; A CaseStudy’, Proceedings of the first WSEASInternational Conference on Economics,Political and Law Science, September, 2012,pp.119-124.[14] Wagerman, S. A., and Funder, D. C.‘Acquaintance reports of personality andacademic achievement: A case forconscientiousness’, Journal of Research inPersonality, 2007, Vol. 41, pp. 221-229.[15] Colom, R. Escorial, S., Shih, P. C. & Privado,J. ‘Fluid intelligence, memory span, andtemperament difficulties predict academicperformance of young adolescents’, Personalityand Individual Differences, 2007, Vol. 42,pp.1503-1514.[16] Sanchez, M. M., Rejano, E. I., Rodriguez, Y.T., ‘Personality and academic productivity inthe university student’, Social Behavior andPersonality, 2001, Vol.29, pp.299- 306[17] Entwistle, N. Waterston, S. ‘Approaches tostudying and levels of processing in universitystudents’, British Journal of Educationalpsychology, 1988, Vol.58, pp. 258 – 265.[18] Biggs, J.B. ’What do inventories of students’learning processes really measure? Atheoretical review and clarification’, BritishJournal of Educational Psychology, 1993, Vol.63, pp. 1-17,[19] Biggs, J.B. Kember, D. Leung, D.Y.P., ‘Therevised two-factor Study ProcessQuestionnaire: R-SPQ-2F’, British Journal ofEducational Psychology, 2001, Vol. 71, pp.133-149.[20] Biggs, J.B. ‘Teaching for quality learning atUniversity’, Buckingham: Open Universitypress, 1999.[21] Pun, S., ‘Communication as a cognitive tool invisual learning’, International Journal ofEducation and Information Technologies, 2011,Vol. 5, No.1, pp. 96-104[22] Suciu, A. I., and Mana, L., ‘An integrativeinnovative curricular model for teachinglanguages’, International Journal of Educationand Information Technologies, 2011, Vol.5,No.3, pp. 344-351.[23] Jayawardena, L. N. A. C., Kuruppuge R., H.‘Gender and Syllabus Based Study Approachesand Academic Performance’, Journal onEfficiency and Responsibility in Education andScience, 2012, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 115-124,ISSN1803-1617,[on-line], doi: 10.7160/eriesj.2012.050301[24] Wikipedia contributors, Hofstede’s culturaldimensions theory, Wikipedia, the freeencyclopedia, Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hofstede%27s_cultural_dimensions_theory_and_oldid= 503581691, 2012,August 19.[25] National Report, The Development ofEducation, Ministry of Education Sri Lanka,2004, pp. 1-3[26] Gignac, G. E., Genos Emotional IntelligenceInventory; Technical Manual (2nd Ed.),Sydney, Waterloo, NSW, 2010.[27] Forehand, M., ‘Blooms Taxonomy: Originaland Revised’ In. Orey, M (eds), EmergingPerspectives on Learning, Teaching, andTechnology, 2005, Retrieved August 25, 2012,from http://projects. coe.uga.edu/epltt.