1-15

• Liritzis, I.
• Stamoulis, Konstantinos C.
• Papachristodoulou, Christina A.
• Ioannides, Konstantinos G.

It has been about forty years since the dose-rate conversion factors commenced to appear in tabular forms and, ever since, periodical updates have been published. The present work contributes to this continuous updating, using the latest evaluated nuclear data for the 238U-, 235U- and 232Thseries, as well as for 40K and 87Rb, obtained from the Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (ENSDF) database and the Nuclear Wallet Cards. An estimate of the accuracy of the dose-rate conversion factors is further attempted for the first time, by taking into account individual uncertainties in all quantities involved in the calculations. A literature comparison between all previously published dose-rate conversion factors is presented and their Historical Mean (HM) values are calculated. The standard deviation from the HM is introduced as a measure of the fluctuation in individual updates. A selected example is given to show that the use of the HM instead of the present dose-rate conversion factors has a minimal impact on dating calculations performed by the thermoluminescence, the optically stimulated luminescence and the electron spin resonance methods. It is concluded that there is no justification in periodically reviewing the dose-rate conversion factors and thus, the present values can be considered as a revised overview that future dating applications should safely rely upon.

• Physical sciences
• Chemical sciences

• Αρχαιομετρία

dose-rate, luminescence, dating, conversion, U, Th, K, Rb, historical mean, updating

1. Adamiec, G., Aitken, M.J. (1998) Dose-rate conversion factors: update. Ancient TL, vol. 16, 37-50.Aitken, M.J. (1985) Thermoluminescence dating. Academic Press, London.Aitken, M.J. (1998) An Introduction to Optical Dating. Oxford University Press, London.Aitken, M.J., Bowman, S.G. (1975) TL dating: assessment of alpha particle contribution. Archaeometry,vol. 18, 132-138.Bell, W.T. (1976) The assessment of the radiation dose-rate for thermoluminescence dating. Archaeometry,vol. 18, 107.Bell, W. T. (1977) Thermoluminescence dating: revised dose-rate data. Archaeometry, vol. 19, 99.Bell, W.T. (1979) Thermoluminescence dating: dose rate data. Archaeometry, vol. 21, 243-246.Carriveau G.T., Troka, W. (1978) Annual dose rate calculations for TL dating. Archaeophysika, vol.10, 406-422.Danali – Cotsakis, S., Liritzis, I. (1985) U-disequilibrium in Greek archaeological clays and potteryby gamma-spectrometry: effects on TL dating; Journal of the Council of Europe PACT, vol. 15,75-86.Guérin, G., Mercier, N., Adamiec, G. (2011) Dose-rate conversion factors: update. Ancient TL, vol.29, 5-8.Guibert, P., Lahaye, C., Bechtel, F. (2009) The importance of U-series disequilibrium of sediments inluminescence dating: a case study at the Roc de Marsal Cave (Dordogne, France). RadiationMeasurements, vol. 44, 223-231.Kokkoris, M., Liritzis, I. (1997) Dose versus time for U-Disequilibrium and revised dose-rate datafor TL/ESR dating. Journal of the Council of Europe PACT, vol. 45(4), 281-294.Lahaye C., Guibert P., Bechtel F. (2012) Uranium series disequilibrium detection and annual dosedetermination: A case study on Magdalenian ferruginous heated sandstones (La Honteyre,France). Radiation Measurements, vol. 47, 786-789.Liritzis I., Kokkoris M. (1992) Revised dose-rate data for thermoluminescence/ ESR dating. NuclearGeophysics, vol. 6, 423-443.Murray A.S., Wintle A.G. (2000) Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquotregenerative-dose protocol. Radiation Measurements, vol. 32, 7-73.Nambi, K.S.V., Aitken, M.J. (1986) Annual dose conversion factors for TL and ESR dating. Archaeometry,vol. 28, 202-205.