Educational robotics : Open questions and new challenges

Part of : Themes in science and technology education ; Vol.6, No.1, 2013, pages 63-71

This paper investigates the current situation in the field of educational robotics and identifies new challenges and trends focusing on the use of robotic technologies as a tool that will support creativity and other 21st-century learning skills. Finally, conclusions and proposals are presented for promoting cooperation and networking of researchers and teachers in Europe that might support the further development of the robotics movement in education.
Subject (LC):
educational robotics, constructionism, creativity
References (1):
  1. Alimisis, D. (2009). Robotic technologies as vehicles of new ways of thinking, about constructivist teaching and learning: the TERECoP Project. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 16(3), 21-23.Alimisis, D. (2012). Robotics in education and education in robotics: Shifting focus from technology to pedagogy. In D. Obdrzálek (ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Robotics in Education (pp. 7-14). Prague:Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics.Alimisis, D. (ed.) (2009). Teacher Education on Robotics-Enhanced Constructivist Pedagogical Methods. Αthens: School of Pedagogical and Technological Education.Alimisis, D., Arlegui, J., Fava N., Frangou, S., Ionita, S., Menegatti, E., Monfalcon, S., Moro, M., Papanikolaou, K.,& Pina, A. (2010). Introducing robotics to teachers and schools: experiences from the TERECoP project. In J.Clayson & I. Kalas (eds.), Proceedings for Constructionism 2010 (pp. 1-13). Paris: American University of Paris. Barker, B. S., & Ansorge, J. (2007). Robotics as means to increase achievement scores in an informal learning environment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 229-243.Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978-988.Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and ‟making‟ in education: The democratization of invention. In J. Walter- Herrmann & C. Bόching (eds.), FabLabs: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors (pp. 1-21). Bielefeld: Transcript Publishers.Bredenfeld, A., Hofmann, A., & Steinbauer, G. (2010). Robotics in education initiatives in Europe: Status, shortcomings and open questions. In E. Menegatti (ed.), Proceedings of International Conference on Simulation, Modeling and Programming for Autonomous Robots (SIMPAR 2010) Workshops (pp. 568-574). Darmstadt. Retrieved 10 December 2012, from Koning, B. B., & Tabbers, H. K. (2011). Facilitating understanding of movements in dynamicvisualizations: an embodied perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 501-521.Demo, G. B., Moro, M., Pina, A., & Arlegui, A. (2012). In and out of the school activities implementing IBSE and constructionist learning methodologies by means of robotics. In B. S. Barker, G. Nugent, N. Grandgenett & V. Adamchuk (eds.), Robots in K-12 education: A new technology for learning (pp. 66-92). Hershey PA: IGI Global.Detsikas, N., & Alimisis, D. (2011). Status and trends in educational robotics worldwide with special consideration of educational experiences from Greek schools. In D. Bezakova & I. Kalas (eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution and Perspectives (pp. 1-12). Bratislava: Comenius University.diSessa, A. A. (2000). Changing minds: computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Eguchi, A. (2010). What is educational robotics? Theories behind it and practical implementation. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference2010 (pp. 4006-4014). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.European Commission (2011). Work Programme 2012, Capacities, Part 5, Science in Society. Retrieved 10 December 2012, from Initiative (2012). Europe 2020. European Commission. Retrieved 16 May 2012, from, N. (2007). Fab: the coming revolution on your desktop - From personal computers to personal fabrication. NY: Basic Books.Jimoyiannis, A. (2012). The new curriculum for Informatics Literacy in compulsory education: From design to implementation. In T. Bratitsis (ed.), Proceedings of the 6th Pan-Hellenic Conference “Didactics of Informatics”(p.15). Florina: HAICTE (in Greek).Jormanainen, I., & Sutinen, E. (2012). Using data mining to support teacher's intervention in a robotics class., Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning (pp. 39-46). Washington, DC: IEEE.Kandlhofer, M., Steinbauer, G., Sundström, P., & Weiss, A. (2012). Evaluating the long-term impact of RoboCupJunior: A first investigation. In D. Obdrzalek (ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Robotics in Education, RiE2012 (pp. 87-94). Prague: MatfyzPress.Kynigos, C. (2008). Black-and-white-box perspectives to distributed control and constructionism in learning with robotics. In E. Menegatti (ed.), Proceedings of SIMPAR workshops 2008 (pp. 1-9). Retrieved 10 December 2012, from, A., & Alimisis, D. (2013). Planning, implementation and evaluation of lab activities using robotic technology for teaching the phenomenon of motion. In A. Ladias, A. Mikropoulos, C. Panagiotakopoulos, F. Paraskeva, P. Pintelas, P. Politis, S. Retalis, D. Sampson, N. Fachantidis, & A. Chalkidis (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Pan-Hellenic Conference “Integration and Use of ICT in Educational Process”. Piraeus: HAICTE & University of Piraeus (in Greek).Lu, C. M., Kang, S., Huang, S. C., & Black, J. B. (2011). Building student understanding and interest in science through embodied experiences with LEGO robotics. In T. Bastiaens & M. Ebner (eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2011 (pp. 2225-2232). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Nourbakhsh, I. R., Hamner, E., Lauwers, T. B., Bernstein, D., & DiSalvo, C. (2006). A roadmap for technology literacy and a vehicle for getting there: Educational robotics and the TeRK project. The 15th IEEE International Symposium Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 391-397). Hatfield, UK: IEEE.OECD (2008). New millennium learners: a project in progress optimising learning: implications of learning sciences research. Retrieved 10 December 2012, from, J., Bustos, R., & Rios, A. (2011). System of indicators and methodology of evaluation for the robotics in classroom. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Robotics in Education (RiE 2011) (pp. 63-70). Vienna, Austria: Austrian Society for Innovative Computer Sciences. Retrieved 10 December 2012, from, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Computers, Children and Powerful Ideas. NY: Basic Books.Papert, S. (1987). Computer criticism vs. technocentric thinking. Educational Researcher, 16(1), 22-30. Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism. NY: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Piaget, J. (1974). To Understand is to Invent. N.Y.: Basic Books.Resnick, M. (1991). Xylophones, hamsters, and fireworks: The role of diversity in constructionist activities. In I.Harel & S. Papert (eds.), Constructionism (pp. 151-158). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Resnick, M. (2007). Sowing the seeds for a more creative society. Learning & Leading with Technology, 35(4), 18-22. Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Eisenberg, M. (2000). Beyond black boxes: Bringing transparency and aesthetics back to scientific investigation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(1), 7-30.Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Pezalla-Granlund M. (2008). New pathways into robotics: strategies for broadening participation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 59–69.Sullivan, F. R., & Moriarty, M. A. (2009). Robotics and discovery learning: pedagogical beliefs, teacher practice, and technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(1), 109-142.TRTWR (2012). International Workshop “Teaching Robotics, Teaching with Robotics”. Retrieved 10 December 2012, from