Supporting learning with weblogs in science education : A comparison of blogging and hand-written reflective writing with and without prompts
Part of : Themes in science and technology education ; Vol.7, No.1, 2014, pages 3-17
Issue:
Pages:
3-17
Author:
Abstract:
The goal of this study was to compare how weblogs and traditional hand-written reflective learning protocols compare regarding the use of cognitive and metacognitive strategies for knowledge acquisition as well as learning gains in secondary school students. The study used a quasi-experimental control group design with repeated measurements comparing weblogs and text-based reflective journals both with and without prompts. During a learning unit on the subject of climate change, students were assigned one to four experimental groups with different writing assignments and one control group that did not keep a learning protocol of any kind. Comparisons of pretest and posttest scores indicate that students in the experimental groups collectively outperform the students in the control group. Looking closer however, only the groups writing with the guidance of prompts showed better learning gains, while groups writing without prompts did not show significant differences when compared to the control group. There were no differences with respect to learning gains between groups writing weblogs and those writing with paper and pencil when supported by prompts. Without prompts however, students in the paper-and-pencil writing condition performed better than students writing blogs. For blogging students, prompts seemed to be more important to achieve greater learning gains. In addition, students showed greater use of cognitive and metacognitive strategies when guided by prompts. Also here, there were no differences with regard to the medium of writing. Both cognitive and metacognitive strategies were predictors of learning gains. In conclusion, the use of prompts can be considered as important scaffold when writing weblogs or paper based learning protocols.
Subject:
Subject (LC):
Keywords:
Weblogs, learning protocols, prompts, learning strategies, climate change
References (1):
- Andrés Martinez, C. de. (2012). Developing metacognition at a distance: sharing students’ learning strategies on a reflective blog. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25, 199–212.Angelaina, S., & Jimoyiannis (2012). Educational Blogging: Developing and Investigating a Students’ Community of Inquiry. In E. Jimoyiannis (ed.), Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education (pp.169-182). New York: Springer.Askell-Williams, H., Lawson, M. J., & Skrzypiec, G. (2012). Scaffolding cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction in regular class lessons. Instructional Science, 40, 413–443.Attwell, G. (2007). Personal Learning Environments - the future of eLearning? eLearning Papers, 2(1), 1–8. Retrieved 21 June 2014, from http://www.openeducationeuropa.eu/en/elearning_papers.Baker, W. P., Barstack, R., Clark, D., Hull, E., Goodman, B., Kook, J., Kraft, K., Ramakrishna, P., Roberts, E., Shaw, J., Weaver, D., & Lang, M. (2008). Writing-to-learn in the inquiry-science classroom: Effective strategies from middle school science and writing teachers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 81, 105–108.Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkonson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74, 29–58.Bereiter, C. (1980). Development in writing. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 73–94). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Bereiter, C., Burtis, P. J., & Scardamalia, M. (1988). Cognitive operations in constructing main points in written composition. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 261–278.Berthold, K., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17, 564–577.Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: where we are today? International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445–457.Borkowski, J. G. (1996). Metacognition: Theory or chapter heading? Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 391–402.Boud, D. (2001). Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 90, 9–18.Cazan, A. M. (2012). Enhancing self-regulated learning by learning journals. Social and Behavioral Science, 33, 413–417.Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471–533.Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum (2nd edition).Cohen, J. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology – a power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essay in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and higher education, 15, 3–8.Downes, S. (2004). Educational blogging. EDUCAUSE Review, 39, 14–26.Ellison, N., & Wu, Y. (2008). Blogging in the classroom: A preliminary exploration of student attitudes and impact on comprehension. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17, 99–122.Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College composition and communication, 28, 122–128.Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.Galbraith, D. (1999). Writing as a knowledge-constituting process. In G. Rijlaarsdam, E. Espéret, D. Galbraith & M. Torrance (eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 139–159). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Glogger, I., Holzäpfel, L., Schwonke, R., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2009). Activation of learning strategies in writing learning journals: The specificity of prompts matters. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23(2), 95–104.Glogger, I., Schwonke, R., Holzäpfel, L., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2012). Learning strategies assessed by journal writing: Predictions of learning outcomes by quantity, quality, and combinations of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12, 452-468.Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1). Retrieved 21 June 2014, from http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/article/view/1661/1503.Hall, H., & Davison, B. (2007). Social software as support in hybrid learning environments: the value of the blog as a tool for reflective learning and peer support. Library & Information Science Research, 29, 163–187.Harris, K. R., Graham, S., MacArthur, C., Reid, R., & Mason, L. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning processes and children’s writing. In B. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 187–201). New York: Taylor & Francis.Hiemstra, R. (2001). Uses and benefits of journal writing. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 90, 19–26.Hübner, S., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Lerntagebücher als Medium des selbstgesteuerten Lernens - Wie viel instruktionale Unterstützung ist sinnvoll? In M. Gläser-Zikuda (ed.), Lerntagebuch und Portfolio auf dem Prüfstand (pp. 119–137). Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.Jonassen, D. H. (1995). Computers as cognitive tools: Learning with technology, not from technology. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 6, 40–73.King, A. (1992). Facilitating elaborative learning trough guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 111–126.Klein, P. D. (1999). Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes in writing-to-learn. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 203–270.Klein, P. D., & Yu, A. M. (2013). Best practices in ‘Writing to Learn'. In S. Graham, C. A. Macarthur & J. Fitzgerald (eds.), Best Practices in Writing Instruction (pp. 166-189). New York: The Guildord Press (2nd edition).Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.Luckin, R., Clark, W., Graber, R., Logan, K., Mee, A., & Oliver, M. (2009). Do Web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11–16-year-old students. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 87–104.Mason, L. (1998). Sharing cognition to construct scientific knowledge in school context: The role of oral and written discourse. Instructional Science, 26, 359–389.McCrindle, A. R., & Christensen, C. A. (1995). The impact of learning journals on metacognitive and cognitive processes and learning performance. Learning and Instruction, 5, 167–185.Moon, J. (2006). Learning journals: A handbook for reflective practice and professional development. London: Routledge Falmer.Newell, G. E. (2006). Writing to learn. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 235–247). New York: Guilford Press.Nückles, M., Hübner, S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing protocols. Learning and Instruction, 19, 259–271.Nückles, M., Schwonke, R., Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (2004). The use of public learning diaries in blended learning. Journal of Educational Media, 29, 49–66.O’Connell, T. S., & Dyment, J. E. (2011). The case of reflective journals: is the jury still out? Reflective Practice, 12(1), 47–59.O'Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0. Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Retrieved 21 June 2014, from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html?page=1.Peters, E. E., & Kitsantas, A. (2010). Self-regulation of student epistemic thinking in science: the role of metacognitive prompts. Educational Psychology, 30, 27–52.Petko, D. (2011). Writing learning journals with weblogs: Didactic principles and technical developments in the www.learninglog.org Open Source Project. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2011 (pp. 2267-2271). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Pintrich, P. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.Pressley, M., Forrest-Pressley, D., Elliot-Faust, D. L., & Miller, G. E. (1985). Children’s use of cognitive strategies, how to teach strategies, and what to do if they can’t be taught. In M. Pressley & C. J. Brainerd (eds.), Cognitive Learning and Memory in Children (pp. 1-47). New York: Springer.Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R. (2006). Cognitive strategies instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 265–286). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2nd edition).Pressley, M., Wood, E., Woloshyn, V. E., Martin, V. A. K., & Menke, D. (1992). Encouraging mindful use of prior knowledge: Attempting to construct explanatory answers facilitates learning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 91–109.Reigeluth, C. M., & Stein, F. S. (1983). The elaboration theory of instruction. In C. M. Reigluth (ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: an overview of their current status (pp. 335–382). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Rivard, L. O. P. (1994). A review of writing to learn in science: Implications for practice and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 969–983. Robertson, J. (2011). The educational affordances of blogs for self-directed learning. Computers & Education, 57, 1628–1644.Sawmiller, A. (2010). Classroom blogging: What is the role in science learning?. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83, 44–48.Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113–125.Sim, J. W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2010). The use of weblogs in higher education settings: A review of empirical research. Educational Research Review, 5, 151–163.Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2010). Sometimes you need a reminder: the effects of prompting self-regulation on regulatory processes, learning, and attrition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 132–144.Schunk, D.H. (2008). Metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning: Research recommendations. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 463–467.Schwarz, K. (2004). Word processors: Do they enhance elementary school children’s writing?. Retrieved 21 June 2014, from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED490646.Schwonke, R., Hauser, S., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2006). Enhancing computer-supported writing of learning protocols by adaptive prompts. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 77–92.Songer, N. B. (2010). Digital resources versus cognitive tools: A discussion of learning science with technology. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 471-491). New York: Routledge.Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson (6th edition).Thillmann, H., Künsting, J., Wirth, J., & Leutner, D. (2009). Is it merely a question of what to prompt or also when to prompt?. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 105–115.Thorpe, K. (2004). Reflective learning journals: from concept to practice. Reflective Practice, 5, 327–343.Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: Effects on students’ self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 551–567.Veenman, M. J. (2011). Learning to self-monitor and self-regulate. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (pp. 197–218). New York: Routledge.Weinstein, C. E., Acee, T. W., & Jung, J. H. (2011). Self-regulation and learning strategies. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 126, 45–53.Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315–327). New York: Macmillan (3rd edition).Weiss, R. H. (2008). Grundintelligenztest Skala 2 - Revision - (CFT 20-R) mit Wortschatztest und Zahlenfolgentest - Revision (WS/ZF-R) (CFT 20-R). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Winne, P. H. (2011). A cognitive and metacognitive analysis of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 15–32). New York: Taylor & Francis.Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students’ reflective learning processes. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 18-25.Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Reflections on theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 289-307). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
