Η προσέγγιση αντιφατικών θεμάτων στο σχολείο : Η περίπτωση της Περιβαλλοντικής Εκπαίδευσης
Part of : για την Περιβαλλοντική Εκπαίδευση ; No.53, 2015
Issue:
Pages:
Section Title:
Άρθρα με κρίση
Author:
Abstract:
Δεν διατίθεται περίληψη.
Subject:
Subject (LC):
Keywords:
Αντιφατικά θέματα
Notes:
http://www.peekpemagazine.gr/issue/482
References (1):
- Ashton, E. & Watson, B. (1998). Values education: a fresh look at procedural neutrality. Educational Studies, 24(2), 183-193.Barker, B. (1987). Teaching controversy, Cambridge Journal of Education, 17, 107-110.Brown, J., Ross, H. & Munn, P. (2012). (Eds.) Democratic Citizenship in Schools: Teaching Controversial Issues, Traditions & Accountability. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press.Camino, E., and Calcagno, C. (1995). An interactive methodology for ‘empowering’ students to deal with controversial environmental problems. Environmental Education Research, 1, 59–74.Carrington, B. & Truna B. (1988). Children and controversial issues, in B. Carrington, & B. Troyna (Eds). Children and controversial issues; strategies for the early and middle years. London: Falmer Press, 1-10.Chikoko, V., Gilmour, J. D., Harber, C., & Serf, J. (2011). Teaching controversial issues and teacher education in England and South Africa. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(1), 5-19.Clarke, P. (1992). Teaching controversial issues. Green Teacher, 31, 29–32.Cotton, D. R. E. (2006). Teaching controversial environmental issues: Neutrality and balance in the reality of the classroom. Educational Research, 48(2), 223-241.Cox, C. (1985). Peace studies: how they cheat our children. Reader's Digest, 126 (March), 33-38.Disinger, J. (1990). Environmental Education for Sustainable Development? Journal of Environmental Education, 21(4), 3-6.Elliott, J. 1993. Handling Values in Environmental Education. Values in Environmental Education, Stirling, Scotland: Scottish CCC.Ersoy, A. F. (2010). Social studies teacher candidates' views on the controversial issues incorporated into their courses in Turkey. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 323-334.Evans, R, Avery, P. & Pederson, P. (2000). Taboo topics: Cultural restraint on reaching social studies. Clearing House 73 (5).Feldman, L, .Pasek, J., Rome, D., & Jamieson, K. (2007). Indentifying best practices in civic education: Lessons from the student voices program. American Journal of Education 114(1), 75-100.Feldman, L., Pasek, J., Rome, D., & Jamieson, K. (2008). Schools as incubators of democratic participation: Building long-term political efficacy with civic education. Applied Developmental Science 12(1), 26-37.Finn, G. (1990). Children and controversial issues: Some myths and misinterpretations indentified and challenged from a cognitive – developmental perspective. Cambridge Journal of Education 20(1), 5-27.Gayford, C. (2002). Controversial environmental issues: a case studyfor the professional development of science teachers. International Journal of Science Education 24(11), 1191–1200.Geddis, A. (1991). Improving the quality of science classroom discourse on controversial issues. Science Education, 75, 169–183.Hahn, C. (2001). Democratic understanding: Cross national perspectives. Theory Into Practice, 40, (1), 12-22.Harwood, A. M., and Hahn, C. L. (1990). Controversial issues in the classroom. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education.Hopkins, C., Damlamian, J., López Ospina, G. (1996). Evolving towards education for sustainable development: an international perspective. Nature and Resources, 32(3), 2-11.Huckle, J. (1991). Education for Sustainability: Assessing Pathways to the Future. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 7, 43-62.Huckle, J. (1993). Environmental education and sustainability: A view from critical theory. In: Fien, J. (Εd) Environmental Education, A pathway to sustainability. Geelong Victoria: Deakin University Press, 43-68.Jeffs, T. (1988). Preparing young people for participatory democracy. in B. Carrington, & B. Troyna (Eds). Children and controversial issues; strategies for the early and middle years. London: Falmer Press, pp 29-53Jerome L. et al (2003). The citizenship Co-ordinators’ Handbook. Cheltenham, UK: NelsonThornes Ltd.Jickling, B. (2003). Environmental education and environmental advocacy: Revisited. Journal of Environmental Education, 34(2), 20-27.Jickling, B. (1992). Why I don't want my children to be educated for sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Education, 23, 5-8.Kahne, J. & Wertheimer, J. (2006). The limits of political efficacy: Educating citizens for democratic society. Political Science and Politics, 39 (2), 289-296.Kelly, T. (1989). Leading class discussion of controversial issues. Social Education, 53, 368-370.McDevitt, M. & Kiousis, S. (2006). Deliberative learning an evaluative approach to interactive civic education. Communication Education, 55(3), 247-264.Mogensen, F., & Schnack, K. (2010). The action competence approach and the 'new' discourses of education for sustainable development, competence and quality criteria. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 59-74.Muth, K. D., Polizzi, N. C., & Glynn, S. M. (2007). Cased based teacher preparation for teaching controversial topics in middle school. Middle School Journal, 38 (5), 14-19.O’Riordan, T. (1988). The Politics of Sustainability. In: Turner, R. (Ed.) Sustainable Environmental Management: Principles and Practice, London: Belhaven, 29-50.Orr, D. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the Transition to a Postmodern World. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.Oulton C., Day,V., Dillon J., & Grace M. (2007). Controversial issues: Teacher’s attitudes and practices in the content of citizenship education. Oxford Review of Education 30(4), 489-507.Oulton C., Dillon J., & Grace M. (2004) Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education 26(4), 411–423.Παπαδημητρίου, Β. (1998). Περιβαλλοντική Εκπαίδευση και Σχολείο: Μια διαχρονική θεώρηση. Αθήνα: Τυπωθήτω, ΔαρδανόςSingh, B. (1988). The teaching of controversial issues: The problems of the neutrlal –chair approach, in B. Carrington, & B. Troyna (Eds). Children and controversial issues: strategies for the early and middle years. London: Falmer Press, pp , 91-106.Smith, G. (1992). Education and the environment, Learning to Live with Limits. Albany, N. Y.: State University of New York Press.Sterling, S. (1993). Environmental education and sustainability: A view from the holistic ethics. In: Fien, J. (Ed.) Environmental Education, A pathway to sustainability. Geelong Victoria: Deakin University Press, 69-98.Stradling, R. (1984). The teaching of controversial issues: an evaluation. Educational Review, 36, 121-129.Stronck, D. R. (2002). Teaching Controversial Issues of Bioethics. Charlotte, NC: Proceeding of the annual international conference of association for the education of teachers in science. Retrieved from the ERIC database. (ED465619).WCED. (1987). Our Common Future: The Brundtland Report. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.Weinberger, Y. & Dreyfus, A. (2013). Teacher colledge students’ views of controversial issues: Ambivalence and readiness to adopt a stance. International Journal of Environmental & Education, 8, 627-643.Werner, W. (1998). Whatever happened to controversy? Canadian Social Studies, 32 (4), 117-121.Wilson, J. (1986). Race, culture and education: some conceptual problems, Oxford Review of Education, 12, 3-15.
